The new chaos of buying. Branding in the age of too much
When Decision-Making Gets Messy: the Messy Middle
For decades, marketing treated consumer behavior as a predictable funnel. Trigger, consideration, decision. Neat. Linear. Rational.
But real life doesnβt work like that. It never did.
Todayβs consumer journey is anything but linear. We live in an age of endless choice, constant distraction, and invisible algorithms shaping what we want before we even know we want it. Google gave this reality a name: the messy middle.
ZWOT Changed Everything
Back in 2011, Google coined the Zero Moment of Truth (ZWOT). It described the moment when a consumer, prompted by a stimulus, searched for information before making a purchase.
That moment is no longer a point. Itβs a labyrinth.
Consumers donβt click once. They scroll, compare, save, abandon, hesitate, restart.
our brand must appear more than once and when it does, it must show up with clarity, consistency and relevance.
What is the Messy Middle?
Itβs the space between first interest and final decision. Where consumers hesitate and where many brands disappear.
Consumers donβt go from A to B. They loop.
They explore. They expand their options. They browse, compare and discover new brands.
They evaluate. They narrow choices, eliminate alternatives, weigh pros and cons.
This can take minutes or weeks, itβs not linear. Not predictable. And rarely rational.
Everything matters: reviews, pricing, delivery time, familiarity, what friends say, how they feel that day.
And in this chaos, branding becomes the difference.
A strong brand simplifies the journey, creates trust and makes the decision feel easy.
The 4S behaviours: navigating the messy middle in real time
The messy middle isnβt a place. Itβs a pattern, shaped by how people behave across platforms and screens. To understand it, we need to observe what people actually do:
Streaming is no longer just entertainment. Itβs discovery in motion. Consumers are immersed in personalised content across YouTube, podcasts and connected TV. Watching becomes learning. Learning becomes shopping. The journey flows, not in steps, but in signals.
Scrolling is the new window shopping. Whether on social feeds or inspiration platforms, people are always scanning. A single post, image or influencer mention can flip a moment of distraction into a decision to buy.
Searching is no longer just typed input. Itβs voice, image, chat and video. People use Lens to identify what they see. Gemini to explore with conversation. YouTube to watch reviews. Search is multimodal, instant and smarter than ever.
Shopping is seamless and everywhere. In a swipe. In a story. In a click. The traditional path to purchase has shattered into micro-moments. Each one a chance to convert β or be forgotten.
These 4 behaviours prove what the messy middle already tells us: thereβs no funnel, no straight line, no clear step-by-step.
To win, brands need to meet people in the flow, not force them into a path.
Streaming as discovery: 62% of Gen Z discovers products through streaming platforms, where passive watching becomes active shopping.
Scrolling as action: Mobile impulse purchases surged 40%+ YoY . One thumb swipe can convert distraction to decision. A single scroll can flip distraction into decision.
Searching as instant intent: 50% of purchases complete within 1 hour of search. The window for conversion has never been shorter.
Shopping anywhere: 63% of shoppers blend 3+ channels. from TikTok clicks to in-store scans to βbuy nowβ buttons in podcasts.
Evoked set and consideration set
Before consumers search, they remember. They carry mental shortlists. Thatβs the evoked set, the brands that come to mind effortlessly.
Then comes the consideration set , the brands they are actually willing to explore in that specific buying moment.
The two sets overlap, but theyβre not the same. The evoked set is memory. The consideration set is intention. You can be remembered but not considered. Or considered without being remembered until now.
Strong branding helps you exist in both. It creates familiarity that gets you recalled, and relevance that gets you chosen.
Because in a noisy market, being visible is not enough. You need to be mentally available before the search and emotionally credible during the decision.
If your brand isnβt in the evoked set, youβre not remembered. If itβs not in the consideration set, youβre not chosen. And if youβre in neither, you donβt exist in that decision.
So visibility is not enough. You canβt just show up. You have to stick.
That stickiness comes from branding that is:
Consistent across platforms and time
Distinctive in its look, tone, and point of view
Meaningful in the context of the consumerβs life
Think of Nike.
People donβt always look for sportswear. But when they do, Nike is already there, in top of mind, trusted, loaded with meaning. Same with Apple, IKEA, Sephora, Airbnb.
Being in the evoked set is about preference before presence.
Itβs branding that does the heavy lifting before performance marketing even enters the scene.
Because if your brand only lives in paid results, youβll always be paying to be remembered.
Choice overload and feature fatigue: a modern paralysis
In theory, more choice empowers, but in practice, it paralyses.
Choice overload happens when everything looks like a good option.
Too many options. Too many comparisons. Too many "just in case" tabs. We freeze. Or fall back on what we know.
Ask yourself:
How many apps do you have on your phone?
How many do you actually use in a day?
How many browser tabs do you open to read βlaterβ and never go back to?
Exactly.
The mental cost of choice is real. So we defer decisions. Abandon carts. Default to trusted brands, not because theyβre better, but because theyβre easier to process.
Then comes feature fatigue. Brands add more buttons. More plans. More technical jargon.
Itβs meant to impress, but in reality it overwhelms.
People donβt want to study to make a purchase, they want to feel like they already understand it.
In a world full of noise, clarity becomes a competitive advantage and people crave simplicity, not minimalism, simplicity that makes them feel in control
With:
59% discovering brands accidentally via streaming
43% more impulse buys on mobile
50% converting within 60 minutes of search
...consumers face decision paralysis. They default to familiar brands not because they're better β but because they're biologically easier to process (Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2022).
Strong brands cut through complexity and focus, prioritise and say just enough and well.
Because when the brain is tired, and the options are too many, we donβt pick the best option. We pick the clearest.
62% Gen Z discovers via streaming
γ°οΈ
Over 40% mobile impulse growth
γ°οΈ
63% use 3+ channels
γ°οΈ
50% buy within 1h of search
γ°οΈ
62% Gen Z discovers via streaming γ°οΈ Over 40% mobile impulse growth γ°οΈ 63% use 3+ channels γ°οΈ 50% buy within 1h of search γ°οΈ
Digital or physical? The messy middle doesnβt care
People donβt separate online from offline. We do. As marketers. They donβt.
They scroll through Instagram, walk into a store, try the product, leave. Days later, they buy it online. Or the other way around. Sometimes they click "Buy Now" without ever touching the product. Other times, they wonβt buy until theyβve held it in their hands.
Itβs not a linear funnel. Itβs not a battle of channels. Itβs one experience, fragmented by devices but unified by expectation.
Showrooming. Webrooming. Cart abandonment. Retargeting. Itβs all part of the same journey.
Thatβs why branding must be channel-agnostic but experience-consistent.
What people see on screen must match what they feel in real life. Same tone. Same trust. Same promise. Same visual.
The physical store is no longer just a point of sale. Itβs where emotion gets validated. Where people check if the brand lives up to its image. Where branding becomes physical, sensory, real, even if the actual transaction happens somewhere else.
And hereβs the strategic truth: You canβt depend on one channel.
Not in a world where algorithms shift, platforms crash, and digital rules change overnight.
You wouldnβt put all your eggs in one basket, so donβt build your brand in only one dimension.
Because the brand that survives is not the loudest on one platform. Itβs the one that feels familiar, trusted and recognisable, everywhere.
Not all purchases are equal
Not every decision follows the same logic. Some are instant, others take time.
And the type of investment β emotional, financial, functional β shapes the path.
In low-investment purchases, like snacks, skincare or mobile apps, the sequence is often:
Emotion first. Something catches the eye, sparks curiosity, triggers desire.
Action next. The click, the add-to-cart, the tap to download.
Justification last. βIt was cheap.β βIβve seen it before.β βWhy not?β
Here, branding acts as a shortcut.
It drives impulse. Reduces hesitation. Makes it feel safe to say yes.
In high-investment decisions, like buying a house, a car, a course, or switching careers , the path flips.
Logic leads. People search, compare, analyse, take notes.
Desire builds. A preference starts forming.
Emotion seals it. Trust in the brand becomes the deciding factor.
These are not quick choices. They are commitments in those moments, branding isnβt there to seduce, itβs there to reassure, to give credibility, to act as a stamp of trust.
Across both extremes, branding matters, it either pushes the button fast, or it holds the consumer steady through uncertainty.
Because whether itβs a lipstick or a life decision, brands shape how decisions feel, not just what they are.
And what sets winning brands apart?
Winning brands donβt just show up, they stand out, and they stay.
They donβt rely on noise, they build clarity in a world that confuses, build consistency in a world that distracts, build credibility in a world that doubts and they build context in a world that moves too fast.
Hereβs what they do differently:
Theyβre clear. Because confusion kills confidence. If people donβt get it fast, they move on.
Theyβre consistent. Because scattered messages break trust. Every touchpoint says the same thing, in the same voice.
Theyβre credible. Because people donβt buy what you say. They buy what they believe.
Theyβre contextual. Because the right message in the wrong moment is the same as no message at all.
Presence is not power. Relevance is.
And thatβs what separates brands people scroll pastβ¦from the ones they come back to, again and again.
Whoβs Winning the Messy Middle?
Some brands donβt just survive the chaos. They master it.
Apple sells high-investment products, but the decision feels easy. Everything β the store, the packaging, the interface β whispers clarity and control. You donβt buy a product. You buy into the brand.
Nike sells identity. Not shoes. Youβre not buying cushioning. Youβre buying purpose. Belonging. Energy. Their branding is emotion, in motion.
Patagonia wins by standing for something. Every touchpoint reflects its values β transparency, sustainability, anti-consumerism. That clarity of purpose builds loyalty deeper than price.
Glossier and Rhode are born of the algorithm. Built for the feed. They speak the native language of aspiration and belonging. Everything from packaging to community feels personal β like you discovered them before everyone else.
Glossier leveraged these behaviors:
68% of their customers discover products through social scrolling
Their checkout flow takes <90 seconds (vs. industry avg. 3 min)
Proving: speed + discovery = conversion in the messy middle."
These brands donβt compete on features. They build emotional shortcuts. They live rent-free in your mind. Long before you search. Long after you buy.
The new advantage is more and more about branding
ZWOT taught us to show up. The messy middle teaches us to matter. Consumers are tired. Distracted. Overstimulated. If your brand makes life easier, it wins.
These numbers reveal the new math of branding:
59% discovery + 43% impulse + 50% instant intent = 100% need for always-on brand presence.
The win goes to the brand that gets chosen when the consumer no longer wants to choose.
βConsumers donβt choose brands. They live with them.β
β Gerald Zaltman, Harvard Business School
And thatβs the pointβ¦Weβre not building brands to be picked, really, weβre building brands to be lived with.
Data sources: GWI (2023), Google Commerce Insights (2022), Google/Material (2021), Salesforce (2023)